- Created by Unknown User (nagc), last modified by Helene Blanchonnet on May 13, 2022
Vertical coordinate
IFS uses a hybrid sigma coordinate vertical coordinate, η, in which the lowest layers of the model are pure so-called 'sigma' levels, whilst the topmost model levels are pure pressure levels. The hybrid scheme provides for a smooth transition between the two. The vertical resolution varies with geometric height. The vertical resolution is greatest (most fine) in the planetary boundary layer while more coarse near the model top. Pure sigma levels follow the surface topography in the lower layers of the troposphere and ensure no levels intersect the surface.
A characteristic of the hybrid scheme is that the spacing between levels is less over steep orography than at the surface.
The vertical coordinate, η, is monotonic function of the pressure, p, and surface pressure, p s, such that:
η(0,p s) = 0 and η(p s, p s) = 1
The atmosphere in IFS is divided into layers. The pressure at the interfaces between these layers are known as 'half-levels' and are defined by:
p k+½ = A k+½ + p s.B k+½
where p s is the surface pressure.
The A k+1/2 and B k+1/2 coefficients are constants that determine the vertical coordinate. They are stored in the GRIB header of all the fields output from IFS and can be found in the tables listed below for each of the supported vertical configurations of IFS.
The 'full-level' pressure, p k, associated with each model layer (i.e. the middle of the layer) is defined as:
p k = 0.5 ( p k-½ + p k+½ )
The IFS prognostic variables are represented by their values at the 'full-level' pressures p k.
Vertical discretization
IFS uses a vertical finite-element scheme for improved accuracy and reducing numerical noise from the vertical discretization. In the finite element scheme, all variables (including pressure) are stored on the full model levels.
For more details of the vertical scheme, please refer to the references at the bottom of this page.
Vertical configurations
IFS supports a number of vertical configurations, though the mostly commonly used are the 60, 91 and 137 level configurations. Note that the top model pressure level varies between these configurations.
- 16 model level definitions
- L19 model level definitions
- L31 model level definitions
- L40 model level definitions
- L50 model level definitions
- L60 model level definitions
- L62 model level definitions
- Correspondence between 40 and 62 model level definitions
- L91 model level definitions
- Correspondence between 60 and 91 model level definitions
- Correspondence between 62 and 91 model level definitions
- L137 model level definitions
- Correspondence between the L91 and L137 model levels
Below the current L137 Model level definition
The following is the list of a(n) and b(n) coefficients defining the model levels, accompanied by the corresponding half-level, ph, and full-level, pf, values of pressure for a surface pressure of 1013.250 hPa. Also provided are the Geopotential and Geometric heights, the temperature and density of the level based on the 1976 version of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standard Atmosphere as described at:
- U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976 (PDF - 76Mbytes)
- WikiPedia entry for International Standard Atmosphere
For a description of how model levels should be interpreted see IFS Documentation Part III - Chapter 2, Section 2.2.1.
Please ask your Confluence administrator to update the license for the MultiExcerpt App for Confluence .
Admin Info: The error is: license TYPE MISMATCH
Admin Info: DataCenter Confluence: You may need to update the app license to DataCenter.
Error rendering macro 'csv-export'
Cannot invoke "java.util.Map.containsKey(Object)" because the return value of "com.atlassian.cache.Cache.get(Object)" is null
References
See IFS Documentation, Part III: Dynamics for more details of horizontal and vertical grids.
Simmons A.J., and D.M. Burridge, 1981, An energy and angular momentum conversing vertical finite difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates, Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 758-766.
Untch, A. and Hortal, M., 2004. A finite-element scheme for the vertical discretization of the semi-Lagrangian version of the ECMWF forecast model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 130, 1505–1530.
On this page ...