You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

 Status:Ongoing analysis Material from: Linus, Esti, Ivan

 

 

Get a Visibility for Confluence license to continue

Your Visibility for Confluence license does not match the LicenseType<COMMUNITY> license on this Confluence installation. Please get a LicenseType<COMMUNITY> license for Visibility for Confluence and try again.


1. Impact

Early on 26 August tropical cyclone Harvey made landfall on the TExas coast between Corpus Cristi and Rockport. Later the cyclone became stationary for 3 days (check) and a huge amount of rainfall fell over the region (locally more than 1000 mm) and caused massive floodings in e.g Houston.

2. Description of the event

The cyclone formed on 18 August from a disturbance east of the West Indies. The cyclone later made landfall on Yucatan on 22 August. After entering the Gulf of Mexico the cyclone re-intensified. The cyclone made its second landfall on the Texas coast on 26 August.

The plot below shows the precipitation totals over Texas (to be added).

3. Predictability

  

3.1 Data assimilation

 

3.2 HRES

The series of plots below shows 3-day accumulated precipitation (26 August 00z to 29 August 00z) and MSLP valid 27 August 12z from HRES forecasts.

The plot below shows the evolution of the central pressure in Best Track (black) and HRES forecasts with different initial times. The forecasts before 25 August missed the rapid intensification the day before landfall. Also note how the forecast from 24 August 12z kept the intensify for a long time, probably because the cyclone stalled closer to the coast as seen above.


3.3 ENS


The plots below show the tropical cyclone product for TC Harvey.


The figure below includes 3-day EFI and the precipitation from NEXRAD.


The plot below shows the ensemble evolution for 72-hour precipitation for Houston 26-29 August. The ensemble distribution is shown in blue box-and-whisker and HRES in red dot. The model climate is shown in red box-and-whisker positioned on 26 August.




3.4 Monthly forecasts


3.5 Comparison with other centres


4. Experience from general performance/other cases

 

5. Good and bad aspects of the forecasts for the event

  • Early capturing of the risk for moving into Gulf of Mexico
  • Picked up the risk the risk for heavy rainfall (especially HRES) from 21-22 August. Model generated more than 1000 mm/72h locally
  • Did not predict the rapid intensification before landfall.

6. Additional material

  • No labels