page under construction ------------------------------
A large volume of data (100s of TB) is downloaded everyday from the CDS.
In this page we summarise:
CDS Request times: the reasons underpinning the CDS queuing time
CDS Queuing can be monitored from the 'Your Requests' or using the 'CDS Live'
The CDS retrieval times can vary significantly depending on the number of requests that the CDS has at any one time and also based on the following factors that affect EFAS and GloFAS:
- The priority of the dataset in question
- The size of the request
- The number of requests submitted by a user
- The number of requests to retrieve data from ECMWF Archive
- The number of requests requesting a specific dataset
- The number of active slots
- The size of the overall queue.
The CDS strives to deliver data as fast as possible, however, it is not an operational service and should not be relied upon to deliver data in real time as it is produced.
Here we will try to give some context of why requests can takes time:
Data for the CEMS-Floods (EFAS and GloFAS) datasets are held within MARS at ECMWF.
The MARS Service is a system designed for the request of GRIB Files based on a Disk Cache and Tape storage architecture.
Most recent data is held on disk cache with all data being available from Tape.
When a user requests data, the CDS queues the request based on the CDS's own queueing priorities using the factors described above.
Once the job becomes eligible it is passed to the MARS Service at ECMWF for extraction of the relevant fields.
It is only at this point that you will see your job as 'Running'
Selecting areas of data does not mean that you are not retrieving the whole globe. Each timestep of each date of each variable is classed as an individual grib field.
MARS extracts sub areas by retrieving the global grid and cropping the area and returning the requested area.
MARS as a separate service also has constraints on its workload and has separate QOS limits that apply to jobs for data as it is a service shared across Operational services 'ie producing ERA5 and GloFAS' and non operational services such as the CDS.
The CDS service, from time to time, can experience periods of high user activity and increasing queuing time for even small requests. In these times we ask you to kindly wait for the queue to be processed as there are fixed slots available that cannot be increased.
The Figure -1 shows a period of high user activity. GloFAS and EFAS products are served by the adaptor.mars.external service, you can see that the active users (blue line) is well above the green line of 50 slots allocated to the GLoFAS and EFAS requests. When the blue line falls again below the green line then the total queued users start decreasing until eventually there is no queuing time for any user request.
Figure - 1
CEMS-Flood data on MARS: the size of the CEMS-Flood datasets stored on MARS and accessible through the CDS
Table 1 -
Request strategy: the best practices to to maximise efficiency and minimise waiting time.
Table 2 - Summary
Dataset | API field limits | Downloaded data size | Request strategy | Link to example script |
---|---|---|---|---|
GloFAS climatology | 500 | 2 GB | Loop over years | |
GloFAS forecast | 60 | 8.1 GB | loop over years, months, days | |
GloFAS reforecast | 950 | 32 GB | loop over months, days Subset to ROI | |
GloFAS seasonal forecast | 125 | 31.5 GB | Loop over years, months Subset to ROI | |
GloFAS seasonal reforecast | 125 | 31.5 GB | Loop over years, months Subset to ROI | |
EFAS climatology | 1000 | to be confirmed | to be confirmed | to be confirmed |
EFAS forecast | 1000 | to be confirmed | to be confirmed | to be confirmed |
EFAS reforecast | 200 | to be confirmed | to be confirmed | to be confirmed |
EFAS seasonal forecast | 220 | to be confirmed | to be confirmed | to be confirmed |
EFAS seasonal reforecast | 220 | to be confirmed | to be confirmed | to be confirmed |
Whilst submitting multiple requests can improve download time, overloading the system with too many requests will eventually slow down the overall system performance.
Indeed the CDS system penalises users that submit too many requests, decreasing the priority of their requests.
Too many parallel requests could eventually result in a slower overall download time
For this reason we suggest to limit to a maximum of 10 parallel requests.
Example code, download 20 years of GloFAS reforecasts using 10 threads.
import cdsapi from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed from datetime import datetime, timedelta import warnings warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") LEADTIMES = ["%d" % (l) for l in range(24, 1128, 24)] YEARS = ["%d" % (y) for y in range(1999, 2019)] def get_dates(start=[2019, 1, 1], end=[2019, 12, 31]): start, end = datetime(*start), datetime(*end) days = [start + timedelta(days=i) for i in range((end - start).days + 1)] dates = [ list(map(str.lower, d.strftime("%B-%d").split("-"))) for d in days if d.weekday() in [0, 3] ] return dates DATES = get_dates() def retrieve(client, request, date): month = date[0] day = date[1] print(f"requesting month: {month}, day: {day} /n") request.update({"hmonth": month, "hday": day}) client.retrieve( "cems-glofas-reforecast", request, f"glofas_reforecast_{month}_{day}.grib" ) return f"retrieved month: {month}, day: {day}" def main(request): "concurrent request using 10 threads" client = cdsapi.Client() with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as executor: futures = [ executor.submit(retrieve, client, request.copy(), date) for date in DATES ] for f in as_completed(futures): try: print(f.result()) except: print("could not retrieve") if __name__ == "__main__": request = { "system_version": "version_2_2", "variable": "river_discharge_in_the_last_24_hours", "format": "grib", "hydrological_model": "htessel_lisflood", "product_type": "control_reforecast", "hyear": YEARS, "hmonth": "", "hday": "", "leadtime_hour": LEADTIMES, } main(request)