|
|
English used predominantly.
English teachers will be there. Encourage students to write and speak in English as students have asked for more lessons in English.
Tutorial: write in English
ENM is approx 20mins by car from the airport.
Storm Nadine. Case interaction between Hurricane Nadine and cut-off low, ensemble uncertainty & severe weather over France.
Paper: Pantillon, F., Chaboureau, J.-P. and Richard, E. (2015), Vortex–vortex interaction between Hurricane Nadine (2012) and an Atlantic cut-off dropping the predictability over the Mediterranean. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc.. doi: 10.1002/qj.2635 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2635/abstract
Sensitivity - two main issues : Model resolution - to model interaction of the storm and cut-off low; Convection processes.
Linus says ensemble is sensitive to SST. This particular case was in fact used as part of the argument for coupling the ocean model (NEMO) from day 1 in the ensemble forecast rather than day 10 as used in 2012; days 1-9 used persisted SST anomalies.
From last year's workshop, each field ~ 100Kb. Total size of 'data' and 'data_ls' directories was:5.5G, 1.4G respectively , total of 7Gb.
2015 workshop VM, df reports 40Gb /, 28% used (27G)
Priority is the analyses, oper ens & expt gioi
Analyses:
20120915 00Z (single start date), 10 days (to 20120925 00Z), 6hrly (note start date for AN is different to forecasts)
If data size is an issue only use MSLP & T2m for 00Z 15th - 18Z 19th, with all fields from 20th to 25th.
HRES:
20120920 00Z, 5 days (to 20120925 00Z), 6hrly, native grid
Same fields as analysis (see below)
Operational ensemble as used in 2012:
TL639L91. 20120920 00Z (single start date), 5 days (to 20120925 00Z), 6hrly (all members)
Same fields as analysis
Current operational ensemble (with NEMO on day 1) (expt id: gioi)
TCo639L91. 20120920 00Z (single start date), 5 days (to 20120925 00Z), 6hrly (all members)
Same fields as analysis
Uncertainty runs:
TL319L91. No NEMO coupling, wave model off (OpenIFS config)
May not get time in workshop to look at these but would like to have the data available.
(a) EDA/SV/SPPT/SKEB - exptid 'gik3'
(b) EDA/SV only - exptid 'gin5'
(c) SPPT/SKEB only - exptid 'gin7'
Dates/steps/fields as above.
Grid resolution
Use native grid of analysis/forecasts if at all possible. Revise if total data is going to be more than 10Gb.
Fields :
MSLP, T2m, 10m winds, 6hrly accum. total precipitation,
SST : from analysis, HRES, oper. ensemble and gioi (to compare)
Geopotential, temperature, potential temperature & equivalent potential temperature, winds (U/V), relative humidity (rather than sp. hum.), @ 200, 500, 700, 850 hPa
also 925hPa for winds & humidity only
PV + wind (U/V) @ 330 K isentrope (see Fig.10 in paper)
Geopotential/winds at 2PVU (do we archive these?)
Vertical x-sections
Potential temperature, potential vorticity, winds, humidity, vertical vel. -- needs reviewing, would need all pressure levels & will be too much data? PV + winds would be priority.
Request is for: all levels for : PV, winds, vertical velocity (if poss), rel. humidity, potential temperature (last two if space permits).
Suggest: if data size is a problem, omit the reduced resolution uncertainty runs.
Good if students could use metview to plot x-section through centre of storm, finding the storm centre themselves, perhaps modifying macros themselves ?
If too much data, make the full level data only available at specific times (e.g. daily). Failing that pre-plot images.
Observational data
Data domain
Extract data similar to domain in figure 1 but suggest crop 50W - 20E / 30N - 65N (adjust to suitable aspect ratio)
Other data
Satellite images to be provided by ENM & included on VM. Due to licensing restrictions we can't provide the GRIB data on the VM.
Perhaps we can overlay geotagged TIFs?
Icons
Horizontal / isobaric maps
Students should do at least:
From Frédéric: (15/Mar)
SCM:
I have the radiation exercices and convection exercices from previous workshops. It could be nice to look at the convective tendencies in Nadine's deep convection to illustrate of the convection scheme works. I am sure Peter Bechtold has great ideas about that !
On the second day, François Bouttier can also speak about optimal tresholds to use in order to deal with extremes with convective scale ensembles.
GC: It would be good to add something on this into the exercises?
Notes from Frédéric: (9/Feb)
I just spoke to a colleague of mine teaching statistics. He told me that our second year students that will attend the workshop will have knowledge in PCA and clustering methods via ascending hierarchical classification (with R)
So I think that on Day 2, it would be nice to make them do the PCA for ECMWF t+96 ensemble forecasts (20120920 analysis and forecast for the 20120924, figure 5 of Pantillon), the ascending classification (figure 6) and the clustering (figure 7). We could leave the classification and the clustering as extra questions, to leave room for the stochastic ensemble, the EDA and the class ensemble.
I will also think about the interesting plots that we could do to illustrate this case, for example vertical crosssection of potential vorticity.
SCM exercises - sensitvity of the model to changing physics. Focus on convection, initiation of deep convection. Stochastic physics, impact on convection? impact of convective scheme?
Can we get observations from HyMEX to add to the metview exercises?.
Try to include some Hymex observations in metview VM?
Some questions to include: