...
Status:
...
Finalized Material from: Tim , Linus, Lisa Bengtsson (SMHI), Mike Bush (UKMO)
Discussed in the following Daily reports:
http://intra.ecmwf.int/daily/d/dreport/2014/09/01/sc/
Picture
1. Impact
| Excerpt |
|---|
Significant flooding, due to a relatively short-lived burst of convective activity, affected both Copenhagen and Malmo in the morning of 31 August. Many roads were closed and buildings were flooded. |
2. Description of the event
...
The plots below shows the 12-hour accumulated rainfall between 00UTC and 12UTC on the 31 August. The fist plot is the observed rainfall and the second accumulated rainfall from radar (provided by SMHI).
3. Predictability
3.1 Data assimilation
3.2 HRES
The animation above shows successive HRES mslp and 12h ppn forecasts for Sat night. Mostly near Copenhagen these runs show about 10mm, though within the pink zone there will be more locally. so HRES forecasts are a bit underdone.
...
The plots above show 12-hour accumulation for forecasts from 31 August 00UTC from CF (left), HRES (middle) and 2.8 km AROME (right), provided by SMHI. While the both ECMWF forecast missed the event over Malmo-Copenhagen, AROME had intensive rainfall in the region.
The plot above shows the accumulated precipitation (12-hour) from the MetOffice Euro4 model (4 km resolution) from 31 August 00z provided by Mike Bush, UKMO. The black cross indicates Copenhagen. The forecast has a maximum of more than 100 mm over Mamlo and another maximum north-west of Copenhagen with a maximum of 80 mm.
3.3 ENS
Gallery includeLabel efi1 sort comment title EFI for total precipitation 31 August 
The plots above shows EFI for rainfall valid for 31 August. The first plot is from 28 31 August 00UTC and the following from 29, 30 and 31 August. 3 days before (top left) there was by 12 hours apart backwards in time. Already the forecast from 27 August 00UTC a hint of heavy rain, whilst . The signal got stronger for later forecasts and the 2 and 1 day before forecasts had a notable EFI and SOT (>1) signal. The 'day 0' forecast (first panel) backtracked a little, though is of no relevance for forecasting given issue time.
...
Below we compare different ensembles retrieved from the TIGGE archive.
Probability maps
Probability for .20 mm/12 hours for the 31 August 00-12UTC
| Gallery | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECMWF (32 km)
| Gallery | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DMI-HIRLAM (5.5 km)
| Gallery | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COSMO-LEPS (10 km)
| Gallery | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COSMO-DE-EPS (2.8 km)
Stamp maps
For all ensemble, a maximum of 20 members are plotted. These plots should be compared to the 12-hour accumulation shown above.
31 August 00z
ECMWF (32 km)
NCEP (?? 55 km)
DMI-HIRLAM -DMI (11 5.5 km?)
COSMO-LEPS (10 km?)
COSMO-DE-EPS (2.8 km)
30 August 12z
ECMWF
NCEP
HIRLAM-DMI
COSMO-LEPS
COSMO-DE-EPS
From both these initial times, it is clear that the both global ensembles (ECMWF and NCEP) missed the extreme event. For the next level of resolution (~10 km LAM), the intensity is higher. For the COSMO-DE with 2.8 km the intensity is in the extreme range (>60 mm), but the uncertainty is still large.
...
- Increased EFI values from 3 days before the event.
- Clearly underestimated values in the global models.
- Extreme rainfall predicted by ~3 km limited area models (both AROME, COSMO and COSMO4km UKMO model)
- A good example of the value of limited area models.
...