...
Section | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Section | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Section |
---|
Relationship between spectral truncation and grid point resolution - linear, quadratic and cubic gridsThe relationship between the spectral resolution, governed by the truncation number T, and the grid resolution depends on the number of points on the grid at the equator, 4N, at which the shortest wavelength field is sampledrepresented: linear grid: each wavelength is sampled represented by 2 grid points → 4N = 2(TL + 1) quadratic grid: each wavelength is sampled represented by 3 grid points → 4N = 3(TQ + 1) cubic grid: each wavelength is sampled represented by 4 grid points → 4N = 4(TC + 1) Until the implementation of IFS cycle 18r5 on 1 April 1998, the IFS used a quadratic grid. The introduction of the two-time level semi-Lagrangian numerical scheme at IFS cycle 18r5 made possible the use of a Linear linear Gaussian Grid grid reflected by the TL notation. The linear grid has been used since then, up to and including IFS cycle 41r1. At IFS cycle 42r1, the cubic grid is used and is indicated by the TC notation. |
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
By changing Keeping the spectral truncation constant but increasing the number of grid points at which used to represent the shortest wavelength is sampled, increases the effective grid point resolution can be increased while keeping the spectral truncation number constant.. This allows for a more accurate representation of diabatic forcings and advection, which is then controlled through truncation in spectral space. In addition the cubic Grid point computations, which are often non-linear, benefit from the higher resolution of the grid produced with cubic sampling. Such a grid has no aliasing, less numerical diffusion and provides more realistic surface fields. It also substantially improves mass conservation. |
Section |
---|
Increasing the horizontal resolutionThe relationship between the spectral truncation, T, the sampling (the number of grid points used to represent the shortest wave (i.e. linear, quadratic or cubic) and the grid point resolution, N, allows for three possible approaches for increasing the horizontal resolution:
|
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
The horizontal resolution upgrade at IFS cycle 42r1 is achieved by:
This new grid will be is referred to simply as a cubic octahedral grid. This will be The corresponding spectral truncation is indicated with the notation TCO . |
...
Section | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequently asked questionsWill the change to the cubic octahedral grid affect me if I use regular lat-lon data ?No, users of regular lat-lon data will be unaffected by the change of model grid. They will, however, benefit from the increase of the model horizontal resolution. Will ECMWF make data available on the standard regular and reduced Gaussian grids ?Yes, users will still be able to request data, both in dissemination and MARS, of the standard regular and reduced Gaussian grids. Note, however, that this will be interpolated from the values on the original model grid.See also I make computations involving flux parameters or accumulated fields (for example, to de-accumulate precipitation) and am advised to work on the model grid: which grid should I use ? I use point data (e.g., for meteograms, vertical profiles, etc) - what do I need to do ?Users of point data should not that the coordinates of the nearest grid point will have changed. Users should take particular care for coastal points for which the nearest grid point may have changed from a land point to a sea point or vise versa. Is the new land-sea mask and orography for the cubic octahedral grid available ?Yes, the new land-sea masks and orography fields for HRES at TCO1279 (N1280), ENS Leg A at TCO639 (N640) and ENS Leg B TCO319 (N320) can be downloaded from ... I use the orography in spectral representation - will I be affected ?Although the spectral resolution for HRES remains constant, the spectral orography has changed. If you have this as a static file then this should be updated with the new version. Do I need to upgrade the version of GRIB API I use in order to decode data on the cubic octahedral grid ?Version 1.12.3 of grib_api can decoded fields on the cubic octahedral grid correctly. At grib_api 1.14.0, a new computed key isOctahedral is introduced which allows users to query the grid type. For the cubic octahedral grid, isOctahedral=1; otherwise, isOctahedral=0. Can GRIBEX decode data on the cubic octahedral grid ?To be checked. But you should not use GRIBEXGRIBEX is no longer supported by ECMWF.
For performing computations with accumulated fields, users are advised to request data on the cubic octahedral grid. Is there any change to the vertical resolution at IFS cycle 42r1 ?No, only the horizontal resolution is increased. The vertical resolution remains at L137 for HRES and L91 for ENS. What will happen if I retrieve IFS cycle 42r1 data from MARS using grid=av ?Users retrieving data from MARS with the keyword, grid=av ("archived value") will retrieve data on the model grid. For data from IFS cycle 42r1 this will be the cubic octahedral grid. What will happen if I retrieve IFS cycle 42r1 data from MARS using grid=1280 ?This behaviour is unchanged. By default, users retrieving data from MARS with the keyword, grid=1280 will retrieve data on the regular N=1280 Gaussian grid. Will ERA-Interim fields also use the cubic octahedral grid ?No, the horizontal resolution upgrade applies only to ECMWF HRES and ENS operational forecasts, including the monthly extension. Will the ECMWF System 4 Seasonal Forecasts (SEAS) also use the cubic octahedral grid ?No, the horizontal resolution upgrade applies only to ECMWF HRES and ENS operational forecasts, including the monthly extension.
|